Focused feedback for your IB Internal Assessment, Extended Essay or lab report. See what works, what needs attention and your next step.
Feedback that supports your thinking. Not a service that writes your assessment.
“The model fits the data well, so it is suitable for predicting future values.”
What supports predictions beyond your observed data—and where could they fail?
Quality, sources and ownership—clearly separated.
Connect your evidence to the relevant assessment criteria.
Review methods, conclusions, assumptions and limits.
Inspect source matches and attribution, not just a score.
Scanning pending setupConsider potential signals with context and clear limits.
Detection pending setupDiscuss your own decisions and understanding.
You explain why a regression model was chosen for the relationship being explored.
A close fit to your observations does not, by itself, justify predictions beyond your data range.
Explain how the sample and assumptions affect the scope of your findings.
Illustrative feedback, not IB marking. The appropriate subject guide and examination session must be verified before criterion mapping.
A live similarity report will identify matched passages and available source links. Coverage and exclusions will be stated. No similarity scan has been run for this sample.
The text mentions a published dataset, but does not clearly link it to a reference.
A reference that cannot be located must be labelled unverified, not invented or assumed valid.
Correctly attributed quotations and shared terminology may produce matches. A low similarity score is not proof of originality.
We will display the selected provider’s findings, eligible text coverage and limitations here once the service is connected. This preview contains no invented AI score.
Provider setup requiredAI detectors can incorrectly flag human writing and miss generated writing. They cannot provide a complete record of AI used for research, calculations, brainstorming or editing.
These prompts help you explain your own thinking. They do not provide scripted answers or imply that every assessment requires a viva.
Launch details and pricing will be confirmed before submissions open.
Sign in. Choose your document, subject, level and examination session.
Review the privacy details and consent before uploading your own work.
Explore a preliminary check or choose a detailed review when available.
Use page-linked observations to reflect, revise and discuss your work.
No invented sources, fabricated data, rewritten assessed sections or guaranteed grades. IAProof is an independent service—not an official IB assessment or certification. Use must follow your school’s rules.
The planned service separates source similarity, citation review and AI-writing indicators. Commercial scanning must be connected before genuine reports can be offered. Neither a similarity percentage nor an AI indicator is a misconduct verdict.
The review method will be clearly stated when submissions open. We will not describe a report as human-reviewed unless a qualified reviewer has actually checked it.
Not yet. This is a feature preview. Uploads and payments remain disabled while the scanning provider, review framework and private document-handling policies are prepared.
The planned service will not publish your document as an example without separate permission. Before accepting work, we must confirm storage, deletion, third-party processing and non-indexing settings and explain them clearly.